Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions aimed of tourists. Other believe that it is the only way to save these tradition. discuss on both side and give your opinion.

In this globalized eon without any qualms it is accepted that, in this materialistic era money is everything for everyone even cultural tradition attract lure from all over the world for money to develop economy of that country. However, people are of different opinion, where some cognitive critics believed that there might be a chance that it will destroy if it is used for tourists whereas; other believed that tourism is the only way to save these traditions. Before completion of my essay both the views will be manifested thoroughly. I, personally agree with later view.

In the inception, tourists is backbone for very country and cultural tradition is the best way to attract tourists. For example, in my country India there are many places that are show traditions of my country such as forts and temples. so, billions of tourists visit those places and authority earn handsome amount of money from this and this will help India to boost its economy. What is more, there are many people who are joined with business like hotel, transportation and food industry and for those what we need are tourists. Thus, cultural tradition is the best way to attract tourists.

Even though, there are good grounds who believe that if it is believed for money making purpose, they lose their original features. To illustrate it, nowadays, youths is consider making money is far better than celebrating cultural event with its original functionality so, there might be a chance in future that culture and tradition will disappear.

to synopsis, it seems that the purpose of making money through cultural traditions has negative effect but if we do not do this we will lose traditions altogether and we will lose our tourists too. 

Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state. Do you agree or disagree?

It is our moral duty to pay taxes. Tax is imposed on individuals that varies with respective income. However, several masses believe that they should not pay taxes to the country. personally, I disagree with this statement and before completion of my essay  I would articulate some reasons to support my view thoroughly.

Government runs the country from the taxes it collects and taxes are collected only from those who earn above certain minimum limit. The government provide all the basic amenities provided different services to citizens and for government administration and projects by collecting tax. nevertheless, people do not want to pay taxes. The paramount concrete reason is dissatisfaction. To put it more simply, they are dissatisfied with government and blame them for things like lack of infrastructure, poverty, and unemployment. Moreover, the other factor generating dissatisfaction is the tax structure itself. Often the tax system is too complex so people run away from paying taxes. Sometimes the tax rates are high and tax slabs are unequal. So, they feel it is not unethical if one goes for tax avoidance or tax evasion.

If people are not paying taxes, it drastically affect a country's revenue generation. For example, my own country India for that matter. But it is equally desired that government come up with a fair tax structure and also make people aware where taxes are being diverted. Tax reform should also be fast so that no public grievance or  non-compliance remains for long. people tax system backed up with strict tax low can produced best results.

To synopsis, I reiterate my opinion by saying that it is the duty of every citizens to pay tax and duty of every government to use it appropriately in public interest. 

Children are facing more pressure nowadays from academic, social, and commercial perspective. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures?

In this globalized eon without any qualms it is accepted that today's children are facing harder challenges in every step of life. Before completion of my essay I would articulate reasons of these pressure also suggest some steps to mitigate the problem thoroughly.

In the inception, it is commonly believe that children of today's society are facing more academic pressure than ever before. The paramount reason is that big planet Earth become small global village today. So, children of today's society are not in the competition with the child who sit next to him, they are in competition with global children. Other reason of academic pressure is parents have high expectation from their children and they want them to excel in every field.

Furthermore,  social and commercial pressure are not at all in exceptional. Socially, the children of today are in huge dilemma. The situation become perilous when children want them to  stay rooted in their own culture. This things leads the children to reduce against the rules. Moreover, they are face peer pressure.For example, a child will undoubtedly want a mobile phone that as big as good or even better than that of his friend.

However, the solution are not simple. Children have to be handled with great care. Parents and the society have to draw line on their expectation and find out the true potential of a child rather than pushing them constantly. Furthermore, social perspective to prepare every boy or girl to become doctor or engineer should be changed.

To synopsis, children today are being pushed beyond their limit to achieve academic, social, and commercial success but by taking some steps, children can be saved. Otherwise, there pressure will stifle the physical and psychological growth of children. 

Some people believe that robots are important for humans to develop their future,while others think that it is dangerous invention that will impact society negatively. Discuss both the views & give your opinion.

Robotics is one of the fastest growing industry in the modern era.The development of robotics technology has grown beyond the imagination of mankind. People are of different opinion, certain individuals think that robotics are regarded as significant development for humans' future. While others argue that robots may lead to negative effects on society. In my view, despite of having some negativity, it would be said that  robots are beneficial to mankind and that will be discussed in upcoming paragraphs.

In the inception, robots have a lots of advantages that may be benefited for humans. Nowadays, robots have become increasingly important for investing and researching hazardous and dangerous environments. that is to say that, the robots are capable of entering an active volcano to collect data or a burning building to search for victims.Not only that,but also robots would be used in medical sector,  as they assist surgery that may truly change the field of  medicine by expanding surgical robots instead of human doctor. To illustrate, today's surgical robot are so advance that it is possible for surgeon to perform remote surgery without physically being in the operation room. In addition to that, they may also eliminate the problems associated with tiredness, distraction and effects of repetitive and tedious task; ultimately, the quality of product may also increased because they have ability to work 24*7*365 without sleep or any other necessity like food. So, basically they might help humanity by increasing the speed of production and being more efficient than human.

However, it is often believed that the effect of robots on society would be harmful. Undoubtedly, robots may lead to unemployment because many companies would replace their workers by robots. As a consequences, the ratio of poverty, suicide, drugs abuse and many social community problems might be raised. Apart from that, robots may not be able to act any different work what they are not programmed to do, if they control of robots goes wrong hands, they may cause the distraction or many other adverse effect. Hence, they may not improve the results of their jobs outside of their predefined programmed.

To synopsis, the growing popularity of robots can be attributed to the fact that they may improve humans' lives in many ways but the potential risk of such technologies would not be neglected.  

In some countries,a few people can earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for the country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount of people can earn. Discuss both sides and express your opinion.

Remuneration is highly controversial topic in employment sector. This has produced polarized opinions, some cognitive critics think that country must stop that and restrict some fix amount of salaries while others  have opposite view. I totally disagree with the view of fixed wages. I would articulate the same perspective in forthcoming paragraphs. 

There are numerous factor why people get higher amount of salaries. the paramount concrete reason is that qualification as well as capabilities. Nowadays,education becomes very expensive and time consuming.Also it requires high efficiency work and determination. For instance, doctors who spend almost six years for graduation and another three years for post graduation. Additionally, medical courses have high tuition fees. Consequently, after study doctors deserve high salaries. Other significant reason is some job have high tense situation and responsibilities. For example, civil services is very stressful job as well as comes with challenging work. So, definitely police officers and civil men wants high rewards from nation.

However, people thought that country must create a boundary for the wages. Nowadays, many European countries, who pay salaries to employees such as scientist, engineer and doctors. Thus, people of developing and underdeveloped countries migrate for better livelihood which may create some negative in some countries.

In synopsis, it is irrefutable that salaries have been accelerated in few years and what I believe is that salaries should decided base of capabilities and academic certificates because they spend time and money for achieving job. Therefore, nation may not make a limit, which may distract mankind.

Some people feel that certain workers like nurses, doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more, when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that they do. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this globalized-eon , without any qualms it is believed that, in this materialistic era the wages paid to workers must be based on what kind of work they are doing. In fact,although some cognitive critics believe that the people who achieves more money due to their extra ordinary talents should be rewarded with humongous amount of money, others are suggesting that the workers like nurses, doctors, and teachers are being ignored and they should have high salaries. Personally, I strongly agree with the former view and reasons with relevant examples to support my view will be manifested in the forthcoming paragraphs.

There are ample, compelling reasons which claims that the celebrities and CEO's of the company must be paid higher than the others , but the paramount reason is that, even though the employees such as doctors, nurses and teachers work enough hard to serve their employers, the actors and leaders are the born talents and they proven them selves by reaching at the top by surpassing the cut-throat competition. In other words since they ave proven them selves superior than other ones by defeating them i certain type of talents and skills, it is irrefutable to say that they are the only one who deserve the gigantic amount of money. For instance, the skipper of an Indian cricket team Virat Kohli earns nearly 228 crore per year due to his by-birth talents and he claimed himself the best by showing his class and mastery in cricket. As a result it is unavoidable to pay him certain amount of money because the team completely depends on him.

In addition, there are some professions which demands very deep knowledge and understanding to gain an excel among their competitions. To put it more simply, the world prestigious company needs that type of leaders who leads the company to new height which no other company have dream till the day. Moreover the herculean tasks which can be only completed by the experts and that expert would demand high amount if he has the courage and appropriate skills to finish it.

There are tons of criteria which decides the revenues of the candidate but the prime criteria is that what the candidate has which segregates himself from the others. The another criteria is that what qualifications in terms of education and work experience does the job seekers have. Furthermore, how good he can master the basic skills which are essential to satisfy the job demands. Added to this, how well he can handle the critical situation and how fast is his decision making capacity.

To synopsis with aforementioned reasons, in spite of having greater needs of the nurses, doctors, and teachers and their valuable work, the talented and gifted ones must be paid high  and the reason behind is that they have proven themselves superior than the others due to their talents, Moreover, they have enough courage and skills to perform impossible tasks which the others do not have.  

Genetic engineering is an important issue in modern society. Some people think that it will improve people's live in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Genetic engineering is one of the latest scientific revolution that causes a controversial issue to humankind.People are of different opinion, where some cognitive critics believe that it improves  humans' lives in many ways while others are threatened by its devastating consequences on the Earth.

In my view, despite having continue discussions regarding its merits and demerits, however genetic engineering may help humankind as well as others living entities if it is used appropriately.

In the inception, the paramount concrete benefit is that genetic modification is very beneficial for agricultural world, as it increases the food production and improve the quality of nutrition. Undoubtedly, the world facing the drastic population growth which means that the food supply might become inadequate because of high demand. To put it more simply, the population is growing day by day, the demand for food supplying is also increase, thus the natural method cannot cope with the demand of the people.For instance, genetically modified rice might be harvested within three months of duration, while the naturally existing crop may take a year to produce the yield.Moreover genetic engineering provides numerous advantages to medical fields.For example, several drugs, vaccines, an insulin would be created because of genetic engineering to treat human diseases.

However, the consequences of genetic engineering may be devastating and irrevocable damages for the humankind.Firstly, the adverse effects on health that may arise due to consumption of genetic engineered crops.To simply this, most of the modified food may contain toxins that are harmful to human health.Secondly, it is also recognized that natural imbalance would be occurred  due to changes in genetics. Finally, there is an evidence to support the idea that manipulation of genes may have long term negative effect on human's health. To illustrate, if someone is trying to change the body color by changing the gene structure then might be exposed to skin cancer.

To synopsis, in spite of the above arguments, it would be said that genetic engineering is contributing positive effects on the development of human beings as well as agricultural field.